What does the Tea Party stand for?

I’ll admit it, there are some things that I get about the Tea Party, but mostly, the thinking of Tea Party members is somewhat of a mystery to me. I understand the populist anger against an increasingly dysfunctional government and an anemic economy. What I don’t understand is Tea Party politicians’ proposed solutions to our problems.

Mostly, this is because the Tea Party very often contradicts itself and their actions rarely live up to their rhetoric. In theory, the Tea Party is in favor of low taxes, cutting the deficit, setting the Constitution as the revered document at the center of government, giving the government back to “We the People” (as opposed to special interests) and promoting states’ rights.

Now that the Tea Party has elected many members to Congress and has a couple preferred Presidential candidates, we can judge how its actions match up to its stated goals. The results are not pretty, and mostly just confuse me.

States’ rights

The Tea Party may claim to be for this in theory, but in practice, it gets more complicated. Turns out, two of the Tea Party’s favored candidates for President, Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry, do not want states to decide on the legality of gay marriage. After initially endorsing states’ rights il/legalize gay marriage, both have said that they favor a national, constitutional amendment against gay marriage. On abortion as well, Perry and Bachmann have taken stances that appear to indicate that they want abortion to be illegalized on the national level. These stances have not hurt them with the Tea Party base at all and have probably helped the two candidates. On these issues, it appears the Tea Party opposes states’ rights when it is otherwise convenient for them.

Giving the government back to “We the People”

Tea Party members seem to have quickly forgotten all that talk of getting rid of special interests in Washington. Dana Milibank recently looked into the only bill that Tea Party Rep. Austin Scott of Georgia has proposed since entering Congress. Scott filed his bill on behalf of a big agricultural grower in his district who was illegally discriminating against American workers to hire Mexican migrant workers. Scott’s bill would make it much harder, if not impossible, for abused workers to sue when their rights are infringed upon.

Likewise, Rachel Maddow recently chronicled the law adjustments and bureaucratic hoops Texas Gov. Rick Perry jumped through to let one of his top contributors build a uranium dump site in Texas. Nevermind the fact that this radioactive dump is built perilously close to a source of Texans’ drinking water.

It just seems that Tea Party politicians don’t care about sticking up for the little guy.

Putting the Constitution first

For a group that prides itself on its reverence for the Constitution, the Tea Party sure has a lot of proposed changes to the Constitution. In particular, Tea Party members seem to want to repeal amendments 14, 16 and 17  to the Constitution and to add a few more, for good measure. What kind of “Constitutionalist” party is this? It seems like Tea Party types would rather scrap the whole thing than put the Constitution up on a pedestal. How can a movement say that it wants it government to be “based on the Constitution” when it also wants the Constitution to be changed so fundamentally?

Lower Taxes

The Tea Party has staked its entire populist message on the fact that it wants low taxes. This is one of the hallmarks of the Tea Party movement. Which is why I find it very curious that the Tea Party arose in a period where taxes are lower than they have been in modern history. Taxes (which Tea Partiers claim are too damn high) are at their lowest point since 1950. How very curious…

The other contradiction that has recently emerged is that Tea Partiers do not actually want lower taxes, well at least not if you’re poor. Turns out, Tea Partiers want to raise taxes on the poor. The Tea Party only wants lower taxes for corporations and the rich.

Cutting the Debt

Tea Party members always lament the deficits  that the government has  been running in recent years. However, they also stand in the way of solving those deficit problems in a responsible fashion. The Tea Party wants to continue the irresponsible Bush tax cuts, which is the principal driver of our long term debt. They also want to eliminate the IPAB which, contrary to the Tea Party’s claims, is about the best chance we have for getting our Medicare costs under control.

The Tea Party does not really want to deal responsibly with our mounting fiscal issues. Their proposed solutions are to cut spending on the poor and vulnerable, cut investment in the future and to privatize and voucherize Medicare. I suppose this could just be considered a policy difference between myself and the Tea Party on how to reduce the debt. But when your policy proposal for fixing the debt involves implementing or repealing policies that will reduce the debt and then using the fiscal calamity that results from your policy choice to justify huge structural changes to American society, I think its safe to say you are not serious about debt-reduction.

The only explanation I have for all these contradictions is that the Tea Party is not a a new political movement, but rather a revival and re-invigoration of far-right wing thinking, and Republican politics.

  1. Good lord bro,
    you cite liberal neo marxist propagandists as your sources of fact. Shame on you but then thats what you wanted anyway.

    • Heathr King
    • June 25th, 2012

    the tea party originated not in response to taxes, but initially in response to the government passing huge spending bills and a health care plan that was opposed by the main American population. They asked congress to read the bill, Pelosi’s response was that they had to pass it to know what’s in it. Really?
    All that the tea party wants is for the government to be run the way that the majority of Americans want it to be run, not how the politicians see it.
    As for the things you cited, it is hard to find a candidate who fits everything that you want to a ‘t’ so it’s more important to choose one who supports your main issues. Also, some of the candidates that it helped get into office started going against the promises made during the campaign and many were afterward denounced by the tea party. It’s funny how you conveniently left that part out.
    When trying to understand something it’s important to get your facts straight especially before posting it online where some misinformed person might be ignorant enough to take everything you say at face value.

    • I’m genuinely interested. Can you name any national Tea Party politicians who were endorsed by a major TP group and, after they got into office, denounced by the Tea Party?

    • don
    • July 4th, 2012

    You cite USA today’s article stating that taxes are at their lowest rates since 1950. What they are talking about here is revenue, not rates. They have spun it so it reads as lower taxes. Of course revenues are down, fewer ppl are working and ppl are taking lower paying jobs. You’re a smart kid. Research for the facts not the spin. The truth is the most important value we have, let us endeavor to present it as such.

    • It is true that revenue is down for a number of reasons, and the economic downturn is high among them. However, tax rates are also (very much) at historic lows. Payroll tax rates are lower now (2012) than they have been since the 1970s, income tax rates remain at 20-year lows, estate tax rates are also very low by historical standards, and capital gains tax rates are at a whopping 60-year low.

      However you look at, by rates or by total revenue, the research shows that taxes are at historic lows.

  2. Fascinating. New movements come foreward claiming they want change, yet align themselves with those they oppose. I see no change in the Tea Party. Is it possible to bring about change by appointing the very wolves that have been killing the sheep to lead them? The Tea Party needs to re-think the term “new leadership”. New blood, not old themes with the same agendas are necessary to bring get America back in line with the Constitution. There is nothing wrong with the Constitution. The problem exist within those wanting to change it to fit their own personal agendas. America needs a third party, the peoples party. A [arty that will represent the people, not foreign powers or special interest. Wake Up America. In the middle age con artist sold consumers hungry pork meal a “pig in the poke” (cat or dog in tied up in a bag supoosing to be a small pig). The victim didn’t know he had been had until he had gotten home and opened the bad (thus the “cat was out of the bag” by that time. Voters hungry for a change may be buying a “pig in the poke” with the Tea Party because the politicians, special interest and metdods proposed to bring about change are the same. Deao Vindice.

  3. (Corrected version):

    Fascinating. New movements come foreward claiming they want change, yet align themselves with those they oppose. I see no change in the Tea Party. Is it possible to bring about change by appointing the very wolves that have been killing the sheep to lead them? The Tea Party needs to re-think the term “new leadership”. New blood, not old themes with the same agendas are necessary to get America back in line with the Constitution. There is nothing wrong with the Constitution. Could be the problem exist with those wanting to change it to fit their own personal agendas. America needs a third party, the peoples party. A party that will represent the people, not foreign powers or special interest. Wake Up America. In the middle ages con artist sold consumers hungry for pork a “pig in the poke” (cat or dog in tied up in a bag suposing to be a small pig). The victim didn’t know he had been had until he had gotten home and opened the bag (thus the “cat was out of the bag” by that time). Voters hungry for a change may be buying a “pig in the poke” with the Tea Party because the politicians, special interest and metdods proposed to bring about change are the same. Deo Vindice.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: